![]() Jitsi has also demonstrated an end-to-end encryption capability, which it hopes to put into production soon. “Everything we do is out there, and people audit us all the time.” “There is reason to believe people get better security from us from the beginning because of the open source nature – you know what you’re getting,” says Emil Ivov, founder of the Jitsi product and head of video collaboration at 8x8. However, that server can be your server in your data center if you don’t want the version hosted by 8x8. Unlike Jami, Jitsi does have a server in the middle handling the task of mixing video streams. “No email is required, no personal information at all is required, to create an account.” In that case, the advantage was not so much security as privacy, he says. One nursing home whose patients are currently unable to have visitors has loaded the software onto iPads to support communication with loved ones. With more people doing remote work, Jami is seeing 500 to 3,000 downloads a day, with an average retention rate of 45 percent, Elkouby says. One nursing home whose patients are currently unable to have visitors has loaded Jami onto iPads to support communication with loved ones. Many of the early active users are law firms and healthcare organizations with security or regulatory concerns. That agency has not put the system into production, but Jami has also attracted interest from a hospital group in Virginia that is piloting it, he says. ![]() The Jami project (previously known as Ring) started with a request from a Canadian federal agency seeking military-grade security for video communications that wouldn’t depend on a centralized server, according to Michael Elkouby, vice president of sales and business development for Savoir-faire Linux. While plenty of organizations have decided that the security of cloud-based collaboration software is good enough for their purposes, others dislike the idea of communications passing through a server not under their direct control. Many of the open source projects focused on video collaboration, and collaboration in general, have made improved security one of their primary goals. Here are some factors you might consider in researching open source meeting tool options: 1. ![]() Wire and Wickr are a couple of other open source options in this category. Signal, the high-security messaging app, supports video calling, but so far only from mobile devices. ![]() Jami was created by Savoir-faire Linux of Montreal, which plans to make money selling Jami Account Management Server, an administrative tool. While it won’t replace the communication and collaboration you would do in Zoom or Jitsi, it could be an alternative for the kind of communication and collaboration associated with Skype or Microsoft Teams - chat with the option to transition to a call when necessary. In contrast, Jami is peer-to-peer text and video chat software for computers and phones, available as a free download. It currently works best in the Chrome browser (with active efforts underway to improve how it works with Firefox) or via mobile apps for Android and iOS. Because it uses the WebRTC protocol, Jitsi does not require a client download. The free Jitsi Meet cloud service is backed by the unified communications company 8x8, which also offers paid plans, but the code is available for you to install on your own servers. Jitsi would rate as the most direct rival to Zoom, given that it supports similar sorts of online meetings and small webinars. That also makes this a good time to look at the open source alternatives with advantages in terms of cost, customization, and control, as well as the tradeoffs that come with them. Open source alternatives could offer advantages in terms of cost, customization, and control. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |